Skip to content
Blogcritical thinking
Why You Feel Out of Time
6
Misagh Zad's avatarMisagh Zad

Listen: Why You Feel Out of Time

0:000:00

Why You Feel Out of Time

Last month, I sat in a quiet café for the first time in weeks.
No music playing.
No notifications.
Just a cup of tea cooling in front of me._

I had promised myself thirty minutes of quiet.
Nothing ambitious.
Just half an hour without rushing.

But something strange happened.
After five minutes, my mind started pulling me away.

I felt twitchy, like I had forgotten something important.
My brain kept whispering:
“You’re wasting time. Hurry.”

I looked around the room.
People were eating slowly.
Talking slowly.
Reading slowly.
The only person running was me.
And I wasn’t even moving.

That moment stayed with me because it revealed something simple and honest:
life was not speeding up.
I was.

And maybe you know that feeling too.
Not panic.
Not stress.
Just a quiet rush inside your chest that never switches off.

This essay is about that feeling.
But instead of giving you a big theory or a complicated idea, I want to break it into small pieces.
Clear pieces.
Pieces you can use.

The Lens: Critical Thinking

And we start with the skill that allows you to see things as they really are.
Critical thinking.
The habit of questioning assumptions and checking what’s true before you react.

It sounds small.
But it changes everything.

Because when you look at your own life through this lens, you stop accepting the first explanation that appears.
You stop saying, “Time is moving faster,” and you start asking, “What is actually happening here?”

This is where another tool helps.
A simple one: First principles thinking.
Breaking a problem down to what’s real, not what looks real.

Let’s use it on your feeling of being out of time.
Not as a lecture.
As a story you walk through with me.

Step one: Time did not change. Your mind changed.

Think about the last time you sat still.
Not scrolling.
Not checking.
Just sitting.

How long did you last?

Most people today can’t sit in silence for even one minute without feeling pulled.

This pull is not pressure from the outside.
It is noise that builds inside you.

When your mind has no stillness, time feels thin.
Moments don’t land.
Your day feels like sand slipping through your fingers, even if nothing stressful happened.

Heroes in stories always begin with confusion.
Something feels off.
They don’t know why.

This is that moment.
The beginning.
The doorway.

Step two: The limit is not time. The limit is attention.

Think of your attention like a small lamp.
Where you point it, life lights up.
Where you scatter it, life becomes a blur.

When attention is split into tiny pieces, your day feels sliced.
You jump between tasks, screens, thoughts, updates.
You touch everything but feel nothing.

Of course time feels short.
Your mind is never fully in one place long enough to feel its depth.

This is the classic hero’s first test.
The test is not the world.
The test is understanding what the real challenge is.
And here, the challenge is attention.

Step three: You create more input than your mind can process.

This part is simple.
And it might be the key.

Every day, you generate far more mental input than a human brain was designed to handle.
Messages.
Screens.
Opinions.
News.
Updates.
Plans.
Comparisons.
Reminders.
Noise.

Your brain was built for life in a village.
You are giving it the workload of a city.

When inputs rise faster than your mind can digest them, your inner world becomes crowded.
And when it’s crowded, time feels fast.

So the sense of being out of time is not a time problem.
It is an input problem.

In Campbell’s terms, this is the revelation moment.
The point where the hero sees the truth hiding under everything.
A simple truth.
A quiet one.
But once you see it, you can’t unsee it.

So what do you do with this?

This is where the hero returns.
Not with magic.
Not with power.
But with understanding.

You don’t need more hours.
You don’t need a bigger calendar.
You don’t need to work faster.

You need fewer inputs.
You need room for your mind to breathe so your attention can settle again.
And when attention settles, time slows.
Not outside.
Inside.

This is the part I want you to really feel:
When you reduce noise, even by a little, your entire experience of time changes.
Minutes feel fuller.
Days feel calmer.
You feel present instead of pulled.

You don’t need a life redesign.
You only need one small removal at a time.
One notification you turn off.
One feed you stop checking.
One habit you let go.
One doorway of noise you close.
One subtraction.
A small one.

Try it.
Notice how your chest loosens.
Notice how your thoughts slow down.
Notice how your day expands by simply taking out what never belonged there.

You don’t fix the feeling of running out of time by adding more.
You fix it by clearing space.

This is the real return of the hero:
the realization that the world is not rushing you.
Your inputs are rushing you.

And you have the power to change them.

So let me leave you with one question:
What is one input you can remove today?
Not tomorrow.
Not next week.
Today.
That is where your time comes back.

Picks for you

The AI Race Is Not a Technology Race

The AI Race Is Not a Technology Race

The AI race is often framed as a competition of intelligence, models, and algorithms, but this essay argues that it is fundamentally an energy allocation problem hidden beneath a narrative of innovation. AI scales not like software but like heavy industry, consuming vast amounts of electricity and triggering political, social, and infrastructural constraints that code alone cannot solve. The real bottlenecks are not technical breakthroughs, but governance issues such as permitting, grid capacity, public consent, and price stability. In this context, energy geopolitics matter less for directly powering servers and more for creating political slack, cushioning public backlash, and making controversial reallocations of power socially tolerable. The true strategic challenge is not building smarter machines, but justifying why machines should receive scarce energy before people, and doing so without eroding trust or legitimacy. If the AI era succeeds, it will be because societies align energy, politics, and meaning through a story people can live inside; if it fails, it will be because that bargain is rejected.

Read more
2026 and the Return of the Whole Mind

2026 and the Return of the Whole Mind

As we move toward 2026, many of us are sensing a quiet imbalance. We think faster, consume more information, and rely heavily on analysis, yet feel less grounded, less certain, and more disconnected from ourselves. This essay argues that the problem is not thinking itself, but thinking in isolation. For decades, logic, efficiency, and control have been rewarded while intuition, emotion, imagination, and embodied knowing were sidelined. AI now exposes this imbalance by outperforming humans in pure analysis, making it clear that competing on cognition alone is a dead end. What remains distinctly human is the ability to sense context, notice subtle signals, integrate feeling with reason, and act with timing rather than urgency. Burnout, anxiety, and chronic overthinking are framed not as weaknesses but as signals of misalignment, where inner intelligence has been ignored too long. The future will favor integrated minds, people who can think clearly while also listening inwardly, adapting without panic, and making meaning from lived experience. The return of the whole mind is not nostalgia or softness, but a necessary evolution: a widening of intelligence that allows humans to partner with technology without losing themselves.

Read more
Why Immigration Feels More Dangerous Than It Statistically Is

Why Immigration Feels More Dangerous Than It Statistically Is

Why Immigration Feels More Dangerous Than It Statistically Is explains how fear can grow even when reality stays relatively stable. Most of what we believe about crime and immigration does not come from direct experience but from repeated images, clips, and headlines designed to capture attention. The human brain uses a shortcut called the availability heuristic, it assumes that what comes to mind easily must be common. In a media environment where rare but extreme incidents are replayed endlessly, exposure replaces frequency, and repetition starts to feel like evidence. Immigration becomes a perfect container for this fear because it is complex, emotional, and easy to turn into a story with faces and villains. Long-term data often shows a calmer picture than our instincts suggest, but fear moves faster than context. The essay argues that critical thinking is not about dismissing fear, but about pausing inside it and asking whether our feelings reflect reality or visibility. When we hold that pause, understanding has room to return, and attention becomes a responsibility rather than a reflex.

Read more
Emotion as Navigation

Emotion as Navigation

Emotion as Navigation argues that emotions are not irrational reactions or inner verdicts, but feedback signals that indicate how our current reality relates to an underlying goal. We do not perceive the world neutrally and then feel about it; perception, emotion, and action form a single system oriented toward movement and adjustment. Positive emotions signal alignment, while negative emotions signal friction, misalignment, or outdated assumptions. Problems arise when we treat emotions as authority instead of information, or when the goals guiding our lives remain unexamined. Critical thinking does not suppress emotion, it interprets it by asking what aim the feeling is responding to and whether that aim still deserves commitment. When emotions are read as data rather than commands, they become a navigational compass rather than a source of confusion. A meaningful life, then, is not emotionally smooth but directionally coherent, guided by alignment rather than by the pursuit or avoidance of feelings themselves.

Read more
Thinking Under Pressure in the Age of AI

Thinking Under Pressure in the Age of AI

Thinking Under Pressure in the Age of AI argues that the real risk of AI is not incorrect answers, but how its speed, clarity, and confidence interact with human cognitive biases. Our minds rely on shortcuts designed for efficiency, and AI amplifies these shortcuts by making information feel complete, authoritative, and easy to trust. Biases shape what we notice, how we judge probability, how we commit to decisions, and how emotion quietly leads reasoning, often without awareness. Critical thinking today does not mean rejecting AI or eliminating bias, but slowing down enough to recognize when judgment is being bent by familiarity, confidence, framing, or emotional ease. As AI accelerates information flow, human responsibility shifts toward interpretation, verification, and self-awareness. When we notice our own thinking habits, AI remains a tool; when we do not, it quietly becomes the driver.

Read more
Good, Bad, and the Direction of Attention

Good, Bad, and the Direction of Attention

Good, Bad, and the Direction of Attention argues that we do not experience the world as inherently good or bad, but as helpful or obstructive relative to an often unexamined aim. Our attention, emotions, and moral judgments are shaped by the direction we are moving in, not by neutral facts. What accelerates our path feels “good,” what slows it feels “bad,” even though neither quality exists on its own. This is why people can react morally in opposite ways to the same event, they are oriented toward different goals. The danger arises when the aim itself remains invisible, because alignment then masquerades as virtue and resistance as evil. Critical thinking begins by asking what aim is generating a reaction, not by defending the reaction itself. When we examine direction before judgment, we regain freedom to question whether speed equals progress, whether friction equals harm, and whether what feels urgent actually leads somewhere meaningful.

Read more
What If We Are Living in a Simulation?

What If We Are Living in a Simulation?

What If We Are Living in a Simulation? treats simulation theory not as sci-fi speculation but as a lens for understanding why the world looks the way it does. Simulations exist to explore unknown outcomes, not to preserve harmony, and when viewed this way, suffering, chaos, and instability stop looking like errors and start looking like data. Human history, with its late arrival, layered complexity, religions, governments, markets, and now AI, resembles a staged experiment where new parameters are introduced to increase unpredictability. Meaning, in this frame, does not disappear, it intensifies. If outcomes are uncertain, then choices matter more, not less. Whether the universe is simulated or not, we already live inside conditions where agency, values, and response shape trajectories. We are not spectators waiting for answers, but variables whose actions feed the system itself. The unfinished nature of reality is not proof of meaninglessness, but evidence that participation is the point, and that how we act under uncertainty is the real test.

Read more

Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…