Skip to content
Blogcritical thinking
Our Addictions
9
Misagh Zad's avatarMisagh Zad

Listen: Our Addictions

0:000:00

Our Addictions

There is a quiet truth most of us feel but rarely say out loud.
We live in a time where loneliness sits closer to us than our own shadow. It walks with us from the moment we open our eyes to the moment we collapse into the night. Some days it is small. Other days it fills the entire room. And because we do not know how to sit with it, we try to outrun it by reaching for whatever numbs the feeling fastest.


Every era has its addictions. Ours simply look different.

  • Not bottles.
  • Not cigarettes.
  • Not casinos.

The addictions of this generation glow.
They vibrate.
They scroll.
They whisper our name through tiny red dots and infinite feeds.

Stay here a little longer. You will feel better soon.

But the promise never becomes reality. It only becomes repetition.
What we are addicted to is not the device.
It is the feeling of escaping ourselves for a moment.

And the reason we need the escape is simple:
We feel alone, even while surrounded by the entire world.


This loneliness is not caused by technology. It is amplified by it.
AI, social media, and algorithmic platforms did not invent our emotional holes. They only learned how to enter them with surgical precision. They learned what makes us pause, what makes us doubt, what makes us crave, and what makes us whisper “just one more minute.”

These systems:

  • persuade without speaking.
  • guide without instructing.
  • shape us without asking for permission.

And because they operate at speeds and scales our nervous systems were not built to handle, our minds try to cope the only way they know how:
by developing new addictions for a new age.


This is the addiction of:

  • endless checking.
  • constant comparison.
  • manufactured urgency.
  • false connection.
  • digital distraction.
  • chasing identity in the eyes of strangers.

These addictions do not destroy dramatically. They destroy quietly.
They do not break lives. They dilute lives.
They turn deep desires into shallow habits.
They replace inner clarity with outer noise.
They erode our capacity for attention, imagination, and honest connection.
They make us forget what it feels like to be fully present inside our own life.

And because the damage is subtle, we mistake it for normal.

  • We call it “being connected.”
  • We call it “staying informed.”
  • We call it “keeping up.”
  • We call it “just how things are now.”

But deep inside, we know something is wrong.


The signs are everywhere.

  • We have more friends than ever, yet fewer people we truly trust.
  • We have more content than ever, yet fewer ideas we genuinely believe.
  • We have more tools for creativity, yet less courage to express what we think.
  • We have more access to each other, yet less intimacy.
  • We have more inspiration, yet more numbness.
  • We have more distraction, yet less meaning.

We are overstimulated and undernourished at the same time.

This is why the addictions of our era are so powerful.
They do not numb pain.
They numb absence.

  • Absence of belonging.
  • Absence of meaning.
  • Absence of stillness.
  • Absence of direction.
  • Absence of feeling seen.
  • Absence of feeling grounded in who we are and what we want.

When a person feels this kind of absence long enough, they reach for whatever gives a sense of soothing. And in a hyperconnected world, soothing is offered everywhere.

  • Scrolling becomes medication.
  • Notifications become conversation.
  • Influencers become companions.
  • AI becomes the listener we didn’t have.
  • The feed becomes a map we follow without knowing why.

We keep returning to the same digital rituals, not because they give joy, but because they give relief. And relief is enough when meaning feels far away.

But here is the deeper truth we often overlook:
What we call addiction is often a search for connection in disguise.

  • We look for affirmation because we feel unseen.
  • We look for distraction because we fear our own thoughts.
  • We look for stimulation because silence feels threatening.
  • We look for digital worlds because our own world feels too small.
  • We look for instant answers because sitting with uncertainty feels too heavy.
  • We look for constant noise because quiet reminds us of our loneliness.

None of this makes us weak.
It makes us human.

Every addiction is an attempt to soothe a deeper emotional need.
Every impulse has a story.
Every craving holds a message.


Our modern addictions are not signs of failure.
They are signals that we are living in an environment our psychology was not designed for.

The friction between ancient emotional needs and modern technological forces creates a kind of spiritual fatigue. We feel stretched in directions we never asked for. We feel pulled into lives we never consciously chose. We lose the sensation of being rooted. We forget what the inside of our mind feels like without interruption.
And the more disconnected we become, the more addictive the escape feels.


But there is something hopeful underneath all of this.
Our addictions reveal what matters most.

  • They show our desire for connection.
  • They show our need for belonging.
  • They show our hunger for meaning.
  • They show our wish for clarity.
  • They show our longing to be fully alive.

This means the solution is not to delete technology.
The solution is to rebuild the relationship between our inner world and the outer world that surrounds us.

We need the discipline of attention.
We need the courage of self-honesty.
We need the strength to question our impulses.
We need the awareness to notice when we are escaping instead of engaging.
We need spaces where meaning grows, not just information.
We need conversations that nourish instead of drain.
We need a community that reminds us we do not have to face the world alone.
We need to choose our inputs with the same intention we choose our food.

What we feed our mind becomes the architecture of our thoughts.
What we repeatedly watch becomes the lens through which we see ourselves.
What we give attention to becomes the gravity that shapes our life.

Without mindful input, addiction fills the emptiness.
With mindful input, imagination fills it instead.


This is the exact moment in history where imagination becomes a form of healing.
It gives us a way back to ourselves.
It reconnects us with our inner voice.
It rebuilds the inner landscape that modern life keeps dissolving.
It reminds us that our minds are not passive screens but creative engines.
It turns us from consumers of meaning into creators of meaning.

And when imagination comes back, something else returns with it:
self-trust.

Because when you can imagine a different version of yourself, you stop being controlled by the version that the world tries to assign to you.


This is why meaning matters now more than ever.
Meaning is not a luxury. It is a stabilizer.
Meaning gives us orientation in a world that does not stop moving.
It gives us identity in a world that tries to define us.
It gives us grounding in an environment built to pull us apart.

Addiction thrives in emptiness.
Meaning thrives in intention.

When intention grows, addiction loses its power.


The goal is not to eliminate every addictive impulse from our lives.
The goal is to reclaim authorship over our attention, our identity, and our emotional reality.
The goal is to build a life where our technology becomes a tool instead of a refuge.
The goal is to remember that we are not fragile users being manipulated by algorithms.
We are minds capable of reflection, aware of our choices, and responsible for our direction.

And the journey back begins with a simple shift:
notice the moments you reach for escape, and ask what you were feeling one second before your finger touched the screen.

Not to judge.
To understand.

Because understanding yourself dissolves the power of any addiction.


We are living through an era where the world is overwhelming by default.
That makes intentional living an act of self-defense.
It makes reflection a source of strength.
It makes clarity a survival skill.
It makes meaning a necessity, not an accessory.

This is the path forward.
Not a purge.
Not a detox.
Not a temporary break.

A return.

  • A return to your own inner voice.
  • A return to your own values.
  • A return to the version of yourself untouched by the influence of endless feeds.
  • A return to the human parts of you that cannot be automated, templated, or optimized.

Because behind every modern addiction is a simple truth:
we long for something real.

And real meaning never comes from escape.
It comes from presence.
It comes from intention.
It comes from choosing what deserves your attention every day.
It comes from building a mind that does not need to run away to feel alive.
It comes from filling the space inside you with something stronger than loneliness.

Our addictions are not the enemy.
They are reminders.
Reminders that something deeper is calling for our attention.
Reminders that our inner life needs nourishment.
Reminders that we cannot live on distraction alone.

And when we listen to those reminders, we begin the work that every generation must do in its own way:
to take back our mind from the forces that try to shape it,
and to rebuild a life where meaning is not something we look for in the world,
but something we create from within.

Picks for you

The AI Race Is Not a Technology Race

The AI Race Is Not a Technology Race

The AI race is often framed as a competition of intelligence, models, and algorithms, but this essay argues that it is fundamentally an energy allocation problem hidden beneath a narrative of innovation. AI scales not like software but like heavy industry, consuming vast amounts of electricity and triggering political, social, and infrastructural constraints that code alone cannot solve. The real bottlenecks are not technical breakthroughs, but governance issues such as permitting, grid capacity, public consent, and price stability. In this context, energy geopolitics matter less for directly powering servers and more for creating political slack, cushioning public backlash, and making controversial reallocations of power socially tolerable. The true strategic challenge is not building smarter machines, but justifying why machines should receive scarce energy before people, and doing so without eroding trust or legitimacy. If the AI era succeeds, it will be because societies align energy, politics, and meaning through a story people can live inside; if it fails, it will be because that bargain is rejected.

Read more
2026 and the Return of the Whole Mind

2026 and the Return of the Whole Mind

As we move toward 2026, many of us are sensing a quiet imbalance. We think faster, consume more information, and rely heavily on analysis, yet feel less grounded, less certain, and more disconnected from ourselves. This essay argues that the problem is not thinking itself, but thinking in isolation. For decades, logic, efficiency, and control have been rewarded while intuition, emotion, imagination, and embodied knowing were sidelined. AI now exposes this imbalance by outperforming humans in pure analysis, making it clear that competing on cognition alone is a dead end. What remains distinctly human is the ability to sense context, notice subtle signals, integrate feeling with reason, and act with timing rather than urgency. Burnout, anxiety, and chronic overthinking are framed not as weaknesses but as signals of misalignment, where inner intelligence has been ignored too long. The future will favor integrated minds, people who can think clearly while also listening inwardly, adapting without panic, and making meaning from lived experience. The return of the whole mind is not nostalgia or softness, but a necessary evolution: a widening of intelligence that allows humans to partner with technology without losing themselves.

Read more
Why Immigration Feels More Dangerous Than It Statistically Is

Why Immigration Feels More Dangerous Than It Statistically Is

Why Immigration Feels More Dangerous Than It Statistically Is explains how fear can grow even when reality stays relatively stable. Most of what we believe about crime and immigration does not come from direct experience but from repeated images, clips, and headlines designed to capture attention. The human brain uses a shortcut called the availability heuristic, it assumes that what comes to mind easily must be common. In a media environment where rare but extreme incidents are replayed endlessly, exposure replaces frequency, and repetition starts to feel like evidence. Immigration becomes a perfect container for this fear because it is complex, emotional, and easy to turn into a story with faces and villains. Long-term data often shows a calmer picture than our instincts suggest, but fear moves faster than context. The essay argues that critical thinking is not about dismissing fear, but about pausing inside it and asking whether our feelings reflect reality or visibility. When we hold that pause, understanding has room to return, and attention becomes a responsibility rather than a reflex.

Read more
Emotion as Navigation

Emotion as Navigation

Emotion as Navigation argues that emotions are not irrational reactions or inner verdicts, but feedback signals that indicate how our current reality relates to an underlying goal. We do not perceive the world neutrally and then feel about it; perception, emotion, and action form a single system oriented toward movement and adjustment. Positive emotions signal alignment, while negative emotions signal friction, misalignment, or outdated assumptions. Problems arise when we treat emotions as authority instead of information, or when the goals guiding our lives remain unexamined. Critical thinking does not suppress emotion, it interprets it by asking what aim the feeling is responding to and whether that aim still deserves commitment. When emotions are read as data rather than commands, they become a navigational compass rather than a source of confusion. A meaningful life, then, is not emotionally smooth but directionally coherent, guided by alignment rather than by the pursuit or avoidance of feelings themselves.

Read more
Thinking Under Pressure in the Age of AI

Thinking Under Pressure in the Age of AI

Thinking Under Pressure in the Age of AI argues that the real risk of AI is not incorrect answers, but how its speed, clarity, and confidence interact with human cognitive biases. Our minds rely on shortcuts designed for efficiency, and AI amplifies these shortcuts by making information feel complete, authoritative, and easy to trust. Biases shape what we notice, how we judge probability, how we commit to decisions, and how emotion quietly leads reasoning, often without awareness. Critical thinking today does not mean rejecting AI or eliminating bias, but slowing down enough to recognize when judgment is being bent by familiarity, confidence, framing, or emotional ease. As AI accelerates information flow, human responsibility shifts toward interpretation, verification, and self-awareness. When we notice our own thinking habits, AI remains a tool; when we do not, it quietly becomes the driver.

Read more
Good, Bad, and the Direction of Attention

Good, Bad, and the Direction of Attention

Good, Bad, and the Direction of Attention argues that we do not experience the world as inherently good or bad, but as helpful or obstructive relative to an often unexamined aim. Our attention, emotions, and moral judgments are shaped by the direction we are moving in, not by neutral facts. What accelerates our path feels “good,” what slows it feels “bad,” even though neither quality exists on its own. This is why people can react morally in opposite ways to the same event, they are oriented toward different goals. The danger arises when the aim itself remains invisible, because alignment then masquerades as virtue and resistance as evil. Critical thinking begins by asking what aim is generating a reaction, not by defending the reaction itself. When we examine direction before judgment, we regain freedom to question whether speed equals progress, whether friction equals harm, and whether what feels urgent actually leads somewhere meaningful.

Read more
What If We Are Living in a Simulation?

What If We Are Living in a Simulation?

What If We Are Living in a Simulation? treats simulation theory not as sci-fi speculation but as a lens for understanding why the world looks the way it does. Simulations exist to explore unknown outcomes, not to preserve harmony, and when viewed this way, suffering, chaos, and instability stop looking like errors and start looking like data. Human history, with its late arrival, layered complexity, religions, governments, markets, and now AI, resembles a staged experiment where new parameters are introduced to increase unpredictability. Meaning, in this frame, does not disappear, it intensifies. If outcomes are uncertain, then choices matter more, not less. Whether the universe is simulated or not, we already live inside conditions where agency, values, and response shape trajectories. We are not spectators waiting for answers, but variables whose actions feed the system itself. The unfinished nature of reality is not proof of meaninglessness, but evidence that participation is the point, and that how we act under uncertainty is the real test.

Read more

Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…